tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-556007631349067217.comments2017-08-08T01:59:57.713-07:00VISUALIZING MATHS & PHYSICS BINNOYhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16087091424947885602noreply@blogger.comBlogger135125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-556007631349067217.post-80559639517689563602017-08-08T01:59:57.713-07:002017-08-08T01:59:57.713-07:00Hi Binnoy,
Great site! I've been curious for t...Hi Binnoy,<br />Great site! I've been curious for the last few days about how the number i could be used in an everyday scenario.<br />Bret Leduchttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14620298481827678181noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-556007631349067217.post-62955717475878866752017-07-25T23:32:22.701-07:002017-07-25T23:32:22.701-07:00Best ias coaching in bangalore
.www.globalias.in<a href="www.globalias.in" rel="nofollow">Best ias coaching in bangalore</a><br />.<a href="www.globalias.in" rel="nofollow">www.globalias.in</a><br />Global Iashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05187135166252454449noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-556007631349067217.post-57275484487504870552016-09-01T01:14:45.277-07:002016-09-01T01:14:45.277-07:00+vaidevi
Glad to kow that it helped+vaidevi<br />Glad to kow that it helpedBINNOYhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16087091424947885602noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-556007631349067217.post-54924656400771155012016-08-31T22:55:12.953-07:002016-08-31T22:55:12.953-07:00This comment has been removed by the author.Vaidevi Ahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15540124719488261204noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-556007631349067217.post-68131643852923321112016-08-06T08:46:40.951-07:002016-08-06T08:46:40.951-07:00Thanks .Thanks .BINNOYhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16087091424947885602noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-556007631349067217.post-88656116743091426872016-05-24T06:37:20.900-07:002016-05-24T06:37:20.900-07:00Dear sir/ Dear friend, My answer for log10(500) is...Dear sir/ Dear friend, My answer for log10(500) is 2.7 (second).This is serious mistake in the first example of your illustration e.g. log10(500)=2.3 which is corresponds to log10(200).<br />Thanks a lot from my heart, for this site.<br />Rajwir Singh, Gurgaon, Haryana, INDIA.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-556007631349067217.post-63293619391250841562016-04-17T05:49:54.733-07:002016-04-17T05:49:54.733-07:00Nice to see you such a blog Binnoy. I will defenet...Nice to see you such a blog Binnoy. I will defenetily tell my students about this blogthullikalhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15115360733630995449noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-556007631349067217.post-72224132805116536932016-04-06T06:34:34.300-07:002016-04-06T06:34:34.300-07:00Thanks.Good to know it helped you visualize it.
Bi...Thanks.Good to know it helped you visualize it.<br />BinnoyBINNOYhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16087091424947885602noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-556007631349067217.post-23162149922339771042016-04-01T01:36:43.232-07:002016-04-01T01:36:43.232-07:00Great! I always try to visualize when I read smth ...Great! I always try to visualize when I read smth including math formulae in order to have a feeling of that. In physics it is of vital importance for me) ... The way you did is interesting and understandable) Like itUnknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12971750399758484710noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-556007631349067217.post-21616151288997946232016-03-16T03:41:50.031-07:002016-03-16T03:41:50.031-07:00I wasnt able to buy the copy through paypal.I wasnt able to buy the copy through paypal.Sivaguru Khttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01492758393521710049noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-556007631349067217.post-16186254197125380652016-03-07T07:49:56.310-08:002016-03-07T07:49:56.310-08:00@NIHAL CHERPPULASSERY
Thanks. Its good to know you...@NIHAL CHERPPULASSERY<br />Thanks. Its good to know you have a blog on these topics.<br /><br />BinnoyBINNOYhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16087091424947885602noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-556007631349067217.post-7039040299945444982016-03-07T07:36:04.026-08:002016-03-07T07:36:04.026-08:00nice. i was too going to post a series on this top...nice. i was too going to post a series on this topic in my blog.. :-) NIHAL CHERPPULASSERYhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12968134735488675815noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-556007631349067217.post-50734177952965147802016-03-06T11:57:10.946-08:002016-03-06T11:57:10.946-08:00Thank you so much
Binnoy.Thank you so much<br />Binnoy.BINNOYhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16087091424947885602noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-556007631349067217.post-23967454584766500602016-03-03T16:09:44.814-08:002016-03-03T16:09:44.814-08:00Binnoy,
Thank so much for the great effort you are...Binnoy,<br />Thank so much for the great effort you are doing to keep the interested people more aware of ambiguous math related issue.<br />It is very clear and informative. <br /><br />Sayed Bishkar<br />jak.jak45@yahoo.comAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-556007631349067217.post-81465039856873635492016-02-03T02:36:23.648-08:002016-02-03T02:36:23.648-08:00Thanks so much.
BinnoyThanks so much.<br />BinnoyBINNOYhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16087091424947885602noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-556007631349067217.post-72060700385157544472016-02-02T17:38:58.239-08:002016-02-02T17:38:58.239-08:00Your are a genius. Unfortunately, although I am a ...Your are a genius. Unfortunately, although I am a chemist, I am not so aware on Maths, not much. that's a pity. But I would be afflicted if mathematicians are not interested in all this work you've done and which deserves more respect.amarblogooglehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00995724759036744980noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-556007631349067217.post-65024044022425902272015-11-18T00:53:04.360-08:002015-11-18T00:53:04.360-08:00مرحبا بكم مرحبا بكم الطوالبه جلالhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00427370304381496290noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-556007631349067217.post-90472624743450742402015-11-14T02:35:40.763-08:002015-11-14T02:35:40.763-08:00Hi,
Its a brilliant question that 'IN CASE OF ...Hi,<br />Its a brilliant question that 'IN CASE OF ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVE,...WHY ARE THEY CONSIDERING THE SIN(ANGLE)?<br /><br />To understand this.....just draw an electromagnetic wave on a paper.<br />Now after it is drawn....move a pencil along its borders.<br />What is noticed?<br /><br />1) The angle at which you have to move your hand changes as you move along varies( angle varies).<br />2) You find the angles or patterns repeating themselves after regular intervals (periodic motion).<br /><br />So lets say you are plotting this sin wave now on a graph.<br />You just have to do y = sin (x).<br />If you want some quantities instead of x and y.....just say time on x-axis and height of wave on y-axis....<br />then you can say that HEIGHT = sin (TIME)<br /><br />When time = 0 sec...height = sin(time) = sin(0) =0<br />When time = 90millisecons......height=sin(time) = sin(90) = 1.<br />When time = 180milliseconds...height = sin (time) = sin(180) =0<br />When time = 270milliseconds...height = sin(time) = sin(270) = 1.<br /><br />Now sin, i said is a measure of how much out of alignement one thing is with other. <br /><br />So just observe a sin wave....At 90 degrees...the wave is out of alignment w.r.t the y-axis and at 0 degrees...the wave is fully in alignment w.r.t the y-axis.<br /><br />Just draw a tangent to the wave when it is at 0 on the x-axis.....you will see the tangent is parallel to the y-axis....thus at x=0 the wave is 0% perpendicular to the y-axis ....hence sin(0) = 0.<br /><br />Just draw now a tangent to the wave when it is at 90 milliseconds....i.e at x = 90 milliseconds.<br />This tangent will be fully perpendicular ( fully out of alignment ) w.r.t the y-axis.<br /><br />And since sin( ) is a measure of how much perpendicular or out of alignment two forces are .......sin (90) = max = maximum height of the wave.<br /><br />Hope this helps <br />BinnoyBINNOYhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16087091424947885602noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-556007631349067217.post-36712213406558228672015-11-14T01:25:59.825-08:002015-11-14T01:25:59.825-08:00Hi,
Ganesh Naik.
Your question is valid. Nature do...Hi,<br />Ganesh Naik.<br />Your question is valid. Nature doesn't give preference to sine waves.<br />A cos wave for example is nothing but a sin wave delayed or advanced by 90 degree.<br /><br /><br />Imagine you have to plot a wave on a graph.<br /><br />CASE 1<br />You start plotting such that at the starting point (origin ) of the graph..the wave is at point zero. (AT x=0 ,...y = 0)<br />At x=0....y=0<br />i.e maybe at time = 0 sec .....the wave-height = 0.<br />Such a wave that is at zero point at the beginning of the graph is a sinewave.<br /><br />Case 2<br />You start plotting the wave such that at the beginning of the graph i.e at x = 0 or time = 0....the wave is at the highest point i.e at 90 degrees.<br />So at time = 0 sec....the wave is at y = 90 degrees.<br />(AT x=0,....y=max = maximum possible height of wave.)<br /><br />Such a wave is a Cos wave.<br /><br />So there is no much difference between a sine wave or a cos wave. It just depends upon from where you start plotting.<br /><br />I hope I interpreted the question properly. <br /><br />Binnoy.BINNOYhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16087091424947885602noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-556007631349067217.post-23445074563889473762015-11-13T22:02:58.260-08:002015-11-13T22:02:58.260-08:00why nature gives much preference to sine wave beca...why nature gives much preference to sine wave because all the changes in nature always in the sine wave.<br />Ganesh Naikhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15670909594260020334noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-556007631349067217.post-88988395952901641162015-11-13T21:55:29.869-08:002015-11-13T21:55:29.869-08:00in case of electromagnetic wave ,why there conside...in case of electromagnetic wave ,why there considering the sin(angle)? Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15670909594260020334noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-556007631349067217.post-1281668931877001852015-09-20T06:48:26.627-07:002015-09-20T06:48:26.627-07:00Hi, I just wanted to say that your articles are aw...Hi, I just wanted to say that your articles are awesome!<br />I have a question: could you write an article about the significance of the equation for the trajectory of a projectile? y=x*tan(alpha) - g/2*(v*cos(alpha))^2<br />I have been trying to understand it for a long time.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10755414306091822921noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-556007631349067217.post-26767213595839592592015-07-21T09:52:41.126-07:002015-07-21T09:52:41.126-07:00Yeah......Good question.
Well Raghu......just ima...Yeah......Good question.<br /><br />Well Raghu......just imagine a boat which is square in size....yes square.<br />or cubical.<br /><br />Imagine such a cubical boat (from all sides cubical,...no curves nothing), such a boat moving through a river.<br /><br />The amount of friction will be more than a normally tapered boat right.<br /><br />Now just see where the friction will occuring....it will be occuring at that front end mainly of this cube which will be facing the water. <br /><br />This side of the cube where the water will be hitting is responsible for max friction. And this side is 90 degrees w.r.t to the direction at which water hits it.<br /><br />Now lets say you get frustuated with this huge friction and you decide to cut the front section of the boat such that it gets tapered at 60 degree w.r.t the direction at which water will hit it when the boat start moving.<br /><br />Because of the 60 degree tapering....the friction will reduce about sqrt(3)/2 times compared to that horribly designed cube of 90 deg at all sides.<br /><br />If you still want to make your boat more pointed....by cutting and tapering the front portion to say 30 deg....the friction will reduce further to half as compared to when your boat was a cube having 90 degree edges..<br /><br />But still why does this happen? Why doesnt the friction dissapear.<br /><br />It is because no matter how much steeply we curve the boat....there will be parts of it which will have to hit against the water.,,,,especially the front section of the boat.<br /><br />The more you make the front section perpendicular w.r.t the direction in which you are moving....more the friction.<br /><br />The more you make this front section tapering.....the lesser the friction.<br /><br />That is why they make jet planes and concorde and all having peak like front portions.<br /><br />If you make the front section of the boat infinitely thin....like a thin sheet...and then move it parallel to the flow of the river....its front portion is so thin....it will hardly hit water....<br /><br />So friction might be around nill....but not nill because this sheet still will have some thickness to it,<br /><br />So friction in case of a boat will come into play due to water hitting some section of your boat which lies somewhat perpendicular to the direction in which water will be hitting it .<br /><br />NOW WHY IS THAT AT IF YOU MOVE AT 180 DEGREES WITH RESPECT TO THE RIVER.....FRICTION WILL INCREASE..<br /><br />Well consider...two cases...<br /><br />case 1<br />You move in the same direction of the river....in this case....the water particles in the river and your boat , they are moving in the same direction....so the water particles will hit the front of your boat less vigirously. So you will feel the fury of these water particles less and so less friction.<br /><br /><br />Case 2<br />If you move in the opposite direction of the river.....the relative velocity between you and the water particles will be very high.<br />Now not only will the water particles hit you more vigirously<br />....but your boat also with its own velocity will hit the water in the river more vigirously..<br /><br />Its like if you collide into a person who was running in the opposite direction in which you were running....wont the impact be higher..<br /><br />On the other hand if you collide into a person who was running in the same direction in which you were running but somewhat slow....wont the impact be lower??<br /><br />So The fricition will be depending on two things..<br />1] How perpendicular the front section is w.r.t to the flow of water...(so a cross product here)<br /><br />2] How aligned you are with the flow of water...(so dot-product here).<br /><br />So the equation of friction will have i think cross-product and dot-product together.<br /><br />So it will have sin( ) and cos ( ) both in its equation.<br /><br /><br />A great question by the way!!!<br /><br /><br />Let me know if there are any further questions.<br /><br />Hope this helps<br />BinnoyBINNOYhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16087091424947885602noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-556007631349067217.post-68133638918425480472015-07-21T09:05:45.067-07:002015-07-21T09:05:45.067-07:00"Cross product comes into picture whenever tw..."Cross product comes into picture whenever two objects work against each other, completely out of line and produce maximum impact when perpendicular".<br /><br />I have some basic doubt...<br /><br /><br />|||| Now imagine the same boat and the same river, but this time instead of measuring the velocity of the river, you want to measure the friction between the boat and the river<br /><br />Friction will be maximum when boat goes in opposite to river flow... so it should be 180 degrees right... but how it produces maximum friction when 90 degrees.. <br />might be i misunderstood some simple concept... pls clear my doubt binnoy.. Thanks Raghuhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08809712636517939891noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-556007631349067217.post-83578890408102742502015-07-21T08:59:01.986-07:002015-07-21T08:59:01.986-07:00You are welcome Raghu
BinnoyYou are welcome Raghu<br />BinnoyBINNOYhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16087091424947885602noreply@blogger.com